Insights into Invalid Insolvency Appointments and Appointees Remuneration

When a business faces insolvency, one of the most overlooked yet critical aspects is ensuring that administrators and receivers are legally and correctly appointed. In this episode of The Cut, expert insolvency lawyer Nick Christiansen from Sparke Helmore joins the conversation with host Simon Cathro, to break down valid vs. invalid appointments, the risks insolvency practitioners face, and what business owners need to know before making any decisions.

From understanding how appointments are challenged in court to why remuneration is such a hot topic in insolvency, this discussion sheds light on the legal and financial pitfalls that can make or break a business in distress. If you’re a business owner, creditor, or insolvency professional, this episode is packed with insights that could save you from costly mistakes.

⁠Key points discussed in this episode:

  • Valid vs. Invalid Appointments Matter – Administrators and receivers must conduct due diligence to ensure legal appointments; mistakes can result in personal liability.
  • Remuneration Isn’t Always Guaranteed – Insolvency professionals must prove their fees are reasonable, and creditors can challenge them in court.
  • Creditors Have More Power Than They Think – From challenging fees to influencing court decisions, creditors play a bigger role in insolvency than most realize.

Links:

Cathro & Partners are experts in providing insolvency and restructuring services that help to create and preserve business value and to enable individuals to make a fresh start. The firm specialises in restructuring, turnaround, personal and corporate insolvency, safe harbour, secured enforcement services, government advisory services and pre-lending services. For a confidential discussion on any of the above, please reach out to one of our experts.

SERVICES

Services

Recent Articles

From 1 July 2026, employers will be required to remit superannuation contributions within seven days of paying employee wages, rather than under the current payment framework, which can be up to 3 months. This reform, commonly referred to as Payday Super, represents a material shift in the timing of employer obligations and has

From 1 July 2026, employers will be required to remit superannuation contributions within seven days of paying employee wages, rather than under the current payment framework, which can be up to 3 months. This reform, commonly referred to as Payday Super, represents a material shift in the timing of employer obligations and has

From 2 February 2026, residential addresses of company officeholders no longer appear on company extracts purchased through ASIC. The reform has been presented as a privacy and safety measure aimed at reducing identity theft and cyber-enabled risks. ASIC has confirmed that residential address information will continue to be collected and

From 2 February 2026, residential addresses of company officeholders no longer appear on company extracts purchased through ASIC. The reform has been presented as a privacy and safety measure aimed at reducing identity theft and cyber-enabled risks. ASIC has confirmed that residential address information will continue to be collected and

At Cathro & Partners, we provide live access to ASIC insolvency statistics through our website dashboard, Cathro Clarity, enabling stakeholders to track insolvency trends and market movements in near real time. When the Small Business Restructuring (SBR) regime was introduced in FY21–22, initial uptake was modest, with just 37 restructuring plans recorded nationally

At Cathro & Partners, we provide live access to ASIC insolvency statistics through our website dashboard, Cathro Clarity, enabling stakeholders to track insolvency trends and market movements in near real time. When the Small Business Restructuring (SBR) regime was introduced in FY21–22, initial uptake was modest, with just 37 restructuring plans recorded nationally